Skip to main content

Table 2 Analysis of combination of modalities

From: Label-free multimodal electro-thermo-mechanical (ETM) phenotyping as a novel biomarker to differentiate between normal, benign, and cancerous breast biopsy tissues

Modality

COMPARISON GROUP

AN vs. FA

AN vs. CA

FA vs. CA

Z

1.65e-1

(ns)

2.6e-3

(**)

2.02e-2

(*)

K

6.4e-5

(***)

7.64e-8

(***)

1.15e-1

(ns)

k

1.6e-4

(***)

1.4e-4

(***)

8.1e-2

(ns)

%R

2.3e-4

(***)

2.2e-3

(**)

7.9e-2

(ns)

Z and K

1.32e-4

(***)

4.63e-9

(***)

1.64e-2

(*)

Z and k

3.05e-4

(***)

5.76e-6

(***)

1.21e-2

(*)

Z and %R

4.24e-4

(***)

7.5e-5

(***)

1.2e-2

(*)

K and k

2e-7

(***)

2.8e-10

(***)

5.3e-2

(ns)

K and %R

2.8e-7

(***)

4e-9

(***)

5.18e-2

(ns)

k and %R

6.7e-7

(***)

5e-6

(***)

3.9e-2

(*)

Z, K, and k

3.8e-7

(***)

1.44e-11

(***)

8.7e-3

(**)

Z, K, and %R

5.3e-7

(***)

1.9e-10

(***)

8.6e-3

(**)

K, k, and %R

9e-10

(***)

1.23e-11

(***)

2.52e-2

(*)

Z, k, and %R

1.2e-6

(***)

1.9e-7

(***)

6.5e-3

(**)

Z, K, k, and %R

1.68e-9

(***)

5.76e-13

(***)

4.5e-3

(**)

  1. *0.01 < p < 0.05
  2. **0.001 < p < 0.01
  3. ***p < 0.001